Does Gordon Brown WANT chaos this week?

This is something I posted at Old Holborn's place.

_____________

Gordon Brown desires nothing more than chaos because he believes it makes him indispensible. So he causes chaos and then pretends to try to fix it but doesn't really try because it's the chaos, not the fixing, that he loves.

Old Holborn may be paranoid but that does not mean, etc...

This is basic stuff in any revol-yooshenry handbook. It was why Lenin fomented war as the ideal (quickest) precursor for seizing power. In the early days of the British Communist Party it was fundamental that street level cadres sought out grievances (poor housing etc.) and used promises to fix them to secure a popular mandate.

The Communists were never going to be popular in Britain because the British had lost their taste for revolution before the Socialist dream was born, but it remains a core socialist tradition, and still thrives in Scottish Labour politics which, tragically for us, now dominate the government of Britain.

There is farce in the innate incompetence of socialists to conduct the business of government (cf. Gordon Brown) because their creed is essentially that of those denied power but desiring it: the complainer, the powerless, the vengeful, the ‘class warrior’ (‘it’s all HIS fault’), the rioter. Socialists want power because someone else has it, not because they want to use it for good, or are more capable than others of doing so. The true socialist mentality will be visible on the streets this week (alongside the well-meaning). Ruiners.

The farce of the socialists’ incompetence when in power is balanced by the tragedy which inevitably follows their acquisition of it (cf. Gordon Brown and all Labour PMs passim). OH says that Brown doesn’t try to fix the problem but I think perhaps he does, if only up to a point, because he is sufficiently vain to believe that he can and he would be unable to resist any opportunity to prove to himself and the disbelieving world that he is superior to his rivals because he is right about everything. Omniscient if not impotent, and the latter only because he is held back by irritations like the constitution (and yes, we do have one, hence his lust for 'constitutional reforms'). This, of course, is the worst possible outcome: a half-hearted, half-cocked attempt at actual governance by a deluded and vain incompetent.

As to this week, a breakdown of civil order would be a disaster for anyone wanting this risibly vain and incompetent man and his evil government thrown out. Was it OH who said this?

If we don't riot, Labour will be destroyed at the next election. If we riot, there won't be one'.

Never a truer word.

For all our sakes, keep calm and carry on. It's just a matter of time before we are rid of them, perhaps for a generation.

We must hope.