16 March 2010

Taxpayers gave £12 million to Unite who gave £11 million of it to the Labour Party.

The rebuttals to the Conservative attack on Unite's donations to Labour are coming thick and fast. The most popular is 'the Labour Party was always the political arm of the Unions', which is offered as justification for Unite's £11 million cash to Labour, its Labour campaign call centres and its sixty-odd Labour PPCs at the coming election.

An affronted wail has gone up: 'It's voluntary and democratic - the will of the members.'

Horsehit.

One recent poll suggested that almost as many trade union members would vote Conservative as would vote Labour. A recent written answer in parliament revealed that a fifth of Unite members have opted out of paying the political levy. Guardian

I am reminded of the old union block votes which, unjustly and scandalously, put the votes of millions of workers behind whatever policy the unions wanted Labour to adopt. Millions of union members were not even allowed an opinion by their oppressors, the Marxist-Leninist union bosses, until Margaret Thatcher took a broom to the midden that was British trade unionism and flushed out the corrupt horseshit which was depriving workers of their rights and freedoms, while it secured political power for the men who ruled who could and could not have a job.

And now we hear that Unite's Millions For Gordon are voluntarily subscribed by union members.

Horseshit.

The earmarked political sub may be voluntary, but union officers have discretion to use central union monies as they see fit, including giving money to the Labour Party, which they do. Whether one likes it or not, to belong to a union is to give money to the Labour Party.

Of course, under Brown, merely to be a taxpayer is to give one's hard-earned to the Labour Party through the "union modernisation fund" - whether one likes it or not. £12 million to Unite over the period in which Unite has given Labour £11million. Yes, Labour saved from bankruptcy and a profit to Unite of £1 million. Ker-ching!

This is unjust, undemocratic and iniquitous. Not that scruples about concepts like justice and democracy disturb Gordon Brown's sleep for a instant. He is content as long as he can raise money to pay his anti-Tory army by whatever means - and eff the taxpaying electorate.

If the Conservative party had a single donor called Unite PLC that provided 40% of its donations, provided the CEO of the Conservative party, had its Head of PR setup websites for the Conservatives, hired people like Damian McPoison to run smear campaigns, unfairly influenced the process whereby many of its Unite PLC employees become Conservative MPs through donations and Unite PLC block votes in CLPs….. we would all be outraged at the infiltration of the Conservative party by a single company. But if we just changed the word Conservative to Labour in the above and deleted “plc” we would arrive at the state of the Labour party. Comment at LabourHome

3 comments:

  1. So let me see if I understand this, person A takes money from person B and says that he will spend the money wisely on person B's behalf and B will reap the benefits. Person B gives the money to Person C who passes most of it onto Person D who happens to be Person A but wearing a different set of clothes. Person B reaps no benefit as promised from the money he gave person A. So persons A and C go to jail for fraud. That is how it works doesn't it or am I missing something.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely right, Brown and Horseshit, one and the same.

    ReplyDelete
  3. " Unite's Millions For Gordon are voluntarily subscribed by union members"

    The money is taken 'voluntarily' from unions members who don't write a letter to opt out of the political levy.

    wv = unionse

    ReplyDelete